<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title> - Recent Posts</title>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/recent.aspx</link>
<description> - Recent Posts</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>Jitbit AspNetForum</generator>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:20:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=21</link>
<title>Message from jfconnault</title>
<description><![CDATA[It may be useful to discover and profile Virtual Machines running on a network. Virtual Machines are using specific MAC Vendor (OUI) values based on the implementation (VMware, Xen, etc.).<br/><br/>Here's a list of profile identifying each type of Virtual Machine.<br/><br/>Note that these profiles are only using MAC Vendor rules with a certainty of 30% so any other OS/User profile with a higher certainty would override this one in case of OS/User profile rule matching: for example the Windows profile would override the VMware Virtual Machine profile if the endpoint happen to match profiling rules in the Windows profile.<br/><br/>Also note that these profiles can be customized in Beacon if needed (name, description, certainty, additional profiling rules, etc).<br/><br/><br/>Profile Name:		Microsoft Hyper-V Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^00:15:5d/i<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>Profile Name:		Microsoft Virtual PC or Server Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^00:03:ff/i<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>Profile Name:		Parallels Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^Parallels, Inc\./<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>Profile Name:		Virtual Iron Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^Virtual Iron Software, Inc\./<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>Profile Name:		VirtualBox Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^08:00:27/i<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>Profile Name:		VMware Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^VMware, Inc\./<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>Profile Name:		Xen Virtual Machine<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		30.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^Xensource, Inc\./<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		30%<br/><br/><br/>Now here's a generic profile for Virtual Machines encompassing all implementations:<br/><br/>Profile Name:		Virtual Machines<br/>Profile Description:		Based on MAC Vendor<br/>Profile Group:		Virtual Machine<br/>Maximum Certainty:		29.00%<br/><br/>Rule 1 Type:		MAC Vendor<br/>Rule 1 Value:		/^VMware, Inc\.|^Xensource, Inc\.|^Parallels, Inc\.|^Virtual Iron Software, Inc\.|^00:15:5d|^00:03:ff|^08:00:27/i<br/>Rule 1 Certainty:		29%<br/><br/>Note that the certainty is a bit lower so if the specific profiles and the generic one were both enabled, the specific one would override the generic one.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=12</link>
<title>Message from jfconnault</title>
<description><![CDATA[You may want to update the CDP Exclusion list to "/air|ade|phone|station|civs|polycom/i" (from "Phone/i") in the Beacon Server configuration. Cisco Video Surveillance IP Cameras CDP platform is usually starting with "CIVS-IPC". The updated CDP Exclusion list will ensure that ports where Cisco Video Surveillance IP Cameras (running CDP) are connected are not handled as trunk ports.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=9</link>
<title>Message from abeats</title>
<description><![CDATA[Chuck, the values listed may be considered best practice based on our experience with a wide range of customers over the past few years.  The timers are balanced in such a way that the 1X auth will fail relatively quickly, thus allowing the MAC auth to occur within a reasonable amount of time (potentially reducing connectivity issues associated with extended authentication timers).  That being said, are you guys using the Microsoft supplicant?  If so, what is the "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\EAPOL\Parameters\General\Global" value set to?  We've found that tweaking this variable, along with a couple of other registry settings, can bring stability and consistency to the login process (assuming you're using the Microsoft 1X supplicant and you're in an Active Directory environment).]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=9</link>
<title>Message from nixonc</title>
<description><![CDATA[Are these values for the interface settings best practices for switch ports? We have a problem where a port occasionally will not authenticate when a person comes in at the beginning of the day. If they unplug their cable, wait a few seconds, and then plug back in the port comes back up.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=20</link>
<title>Message from tpowers</title>
<description><![CDATA[I've had some pretty good results with Radius Test for Windows version 2.4 (http://www.radutils.com/). I've queued up as many as 9,999 authentication requests at once. You can also schedule the quantity and interval that you would like them sent.<br/><br/>Ty Powers<br/>Blue Spruce Technologies]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=20</link>
<title>Message from seth</title>
<description><![CDATA[One other tool that is designed to be used for RADIUS testing is the Radlogin v4 (RADIUS Test Client), which is part of the RadiusNT product by IEA Software.<br/><br/>This test client is a free, graphically interactive (via web based GUI) that acts as a test client for RADIUS systems and has the ability to send RADIUS Authentication and Accounting messages at a high rate of speed through iterations of up to 1,000,000 requests per run.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.iea-software.com/products/radlogin4.cfm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.iea-software.com/products/radlogin4.cfm</a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=20</link>
<title>Message from charles</title>
<description><![CDATA[There appear to be a number of free test-tool options out there.<br/><br/>As a start, from <a href="http://freeradius.org/features/fast.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://freeradius.org/features/fast.html</a> (the horse's mouth, so to speak):<br/><br/>"<i>The best way to determine the performance of a server is via testing. FreeRADIUS comes with a tool called radclient, which can be used for basic peformance testing. A third party tool called RadPerf is also available. It uses the FreeRADIUS libraries to implement the RADIUS portion, and then builds more complex functionality on top of that. It can be used to simulate user logins, and can auto-generate accounting packets for user sessions. </i>"<br/><br/>The referenced tool is at  <a href="http://networkradius.com/radperf.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://networkradius.com/radperf.html</a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=20</link>
<title>Message from admin</title>
<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know of any good RADIUS scalability testing tools?  The specific goal is to test the scalability (ability to process a large number of auth requests) of the authentication system and specifically look at the scalability of RADIUS and Beacon.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=19</link>
<title>Message from Eric Winch</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi IT Sec tech,<br/>Cisco web authentication is possible to integrate with Great Bay’s Sponsored Guest Access (SGA).  For example a Cisco 3750 allowing an alternative “HTTP” redirected authentication to Great Bay’s SGA LDAP data store.  Specifically we configured for 802.1x and MAC Auth Bypass with fallback to HTTP via redirect.  Although this is not a requirement, you may also configure web authentication only.<br/><br/>If a user fails 802.1x and MAC Auth Bypass, they would receive an authentication page (hosted on the switch) after attempting to access a web based resource.  Login credentials are passed to RADIUS for LDAP lookup against Great Bay’s SGA.<br/><br/>There are a few working parts for this solution, here is a short list<br/>            - Cisco Firmware 12.2(50)SE2<br/>                        - Earlier versions were having issues sending RADIUS Authentication requests when using HTTP authentication<br/>            - Configured AAA Authentication and Authorization for RADIUS<br/>            - Enabled IP device tracking<br/>            - Set authentication proxy banners<br/>            - Configured fallback profile not necessary if you want only WEB authentication)<br/>            - Created web authentication acl to apply to associated ports<br/>            - Configured RADIUS<br/>                        - “radius-server vsa send authentication” command required<br/>            - Configured individual interfaces<br/>                        - Applied ip admission<br/>                        - Applied access control list<br/>            - Configure your RADIUS server to perform LDAP lookups against Great Bay SGA<br/>                        - Microsoft IAS does not support external LDAP]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=10</link>
<title>Message from tpowers</title>
<description><![CDATA[I saw this work great at Interop earlier this week. Great Bay's Beacon re-profiled an endpoint based on a behavior change and then published IF-MAP event data to the MAP server which in turn triggered UAC to move the client to remediation and therefore limited network access. Talk about a few moving parts all working in concert...Very cool (open standards) stuff. <br/><br/>Ty Powers <br/>Blue Spruce Technologies]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=19</link>
<title>Message from IT Sec tech</title>
<description><![CDATA[Has anyone used the web authentication features on Cisco's 3750 with Great Bay's SGA?  It seems like it should work, but I thought I'd ask before jumping in..]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=18</link>
<title>Message from jgorsky</title>
<description><![CDATA[The Beacon Configuration Guide for v3.0 is posted on the support site documentation page:<br/><br/>https://www.greatbayswsupport.com/documentation.php<br/><br/>Note that the StartUp Guides are now incorporated in the Configuration Guide (Chapter 4)--they are not separate docs as they were for version 2.1.8.<br/><br/>Enjoy!]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=18</link>
<title>Message from IT Sec tech</title>
<description><![CDATA[Is the documentation for Beacon 3.0 posted somewhere?  We're anxious to upgrade, but I'd like to get prepared before leaping up to the new version.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=17</link>
<title>Message from abeats</title>
<description><![CDATA[I recently had some experience working with 802.1X and Avaya IP phones at a customer site.  Though we had some initial postive results configuring the Cisco switch to support LLDP communications with the Avaya (firmware v2.7 or greater, where LLDP support is built into the firmware) IP phone, the results were inconsistent.  We were initially seeing LLDP immediately put the phone on the correct voice VLAN, but the phone would take upwards of three minutes to get its IP address and start up (and sometimes it would NEVER get an IP and would NEVER initialize).  After fairly extensive testing and "knob turning", my current opinion is that LLDP on the Avaya IP phones and 802.1X on the Cisco switches don’t play nicely together.  We finally reverted to MAC-Authentication-Bypass (MAB) on the Cisco switches, using Beacon's LDAP database as the authoritative (via RADIUS) authentication store for the Beacon-profiled Avaya IP phones.  This solution works quickly, consistently and effectively - every time.  Upon the Cisco switch MAC-authing the Avaya IP phone, the CiscoAVPair "device-traffic-class=voice" RADIUS return attribute drops the phone into the appropriate voice-vlan on the Cisco switch and everything works great.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=3</link>
<title>Message from abeats</title>
<description><![CDATA[sacRyan, I was describing the few sites a while ago where Beacon had not been implemented (and also non-UAC sites) and where the customer wanted to specifically disable 802.1X on a few ports where non-EAP endpoints were deployed.  Though we advised them - and they undertstood the ramifications - of the security hole this would open, the requirement remained on the table in order to ensure that these endpoints were granted some form of network access.  Beacon certainly could have addressed this issue (as you suggested) by profiling these endpoints and MAC-authing them via RADIUS/Infranet Controller MAC-auth realm (thus allowing for consistent 802.1X port configurations enterprise-wide).  These customers have since realized the drawbacks of attempting to deploy 802.1X without Beacon, and have (or are considering) deployed Beacon to address the issue of "disabling 1X on ANY port opens a significant security hole".<br/><br/>Hey, I've encountered an interesting scenario recently where one company didn't want corporate users to EVER land in the guest VLAN (thus circumventing the corporate network for potentially unscrupulous purposes).  Beacon to the rescue!  Let me know if you're interested in discussing that matter on a separate thread.  <img src="images/smilies/wink.gif" border=0>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=3</link>
<title>Message from sacRyan</title>
<description><![CDATA[Beacon has been a great investment for knowing what was actually plugged in where on the network.  Just like you said about your spreadsheets, our network diagrams were outdated and it could have caused a lot of grief to have to track down those issues with the desktop support team.  However, with beacon in play, what devices are you seeing 802.1x not being enabled for?  I ask as we are planning a global 802.1x role out using Beacon to authenticate any device that can't have the UAC client installed.  --Thanks.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=16</link>
<title>Message from sacRyan</title>
<description><![CDATA[We are working on a UAC deployment with Beacon appliances but are having issues with the server service stopping unexpectedly.  Anyone else seen this or had similar issues?<br/><br/>--Thanks]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=15</link>
<title>Message from gregschmitt31</title>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reply!<br/>I did narrow the range, and deslected the ping option, and the profile works.<br/>I should know better, and should have checked the release notes!<br/>Cheers,<br/>Greg]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=15</link>
<title>Message from jgorsky</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, I think you may be running into a documented issue with 2.1.8-37. Based on the presence of the "Ping Sweep" option in the NetInquiry module config in the screen shot. That option was removed in the -38 release of Profiler, and an issue with active inquiries on /16 networks was corrected.<br/><br/>I think upgrading to -38 will resolve your issue.<br/><br/>One other important point to consider with such a large range of host addresses for active data collection: This will result in the Collector with NetInquiry configured communicating with the hosts in that range (all 65K plus of them if my math is correct) at the frequency you have set in the Server module config.<br/><br/>You may want to consider scoping the active profiling a bit, and tightening your Network Blocks in the NetInquiry module config.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=15</link>
<title>Message from gregschmitt31</title>
<description><![CDATA[Greetings,<br/><br/>I'm trying to do an active tcp open port query using the netinquiry module to test for hp printers on port 9100. I have a MAC rule looking for Hewlett which works fine (50%), but the active TCP Port rule isn't. I am certain that there are printers on the /16 network I've defined, and I test connected to a printer on port 9100.<br/> <br/>I've attached a word doc with screen captures of my configuration.<br/><br/>Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!<br/><em>edited by gregschmitt31 on 3/25/2009</em>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=14</link>
<title>Message from tpowers</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hmm...this is a slightly loaded question. This method should work with any phone,  but we have seen instances where even though the 802.1x supplicant on the phone was disabled, it still sent out EAP start frames disrupting the ability to MAC Auth Bypass. As far as the RADIUS attributes, there are Vendor Specific Attributes (VSA)s that upon authentication will inform the switch that the device is a voice device. I was specifically referring to Cisco's ACS previously, but other RADIUS servers provide support for these VSAs also. You would want to make sure before deciding to move forward. There are a lot of options as well as moving parts in an end-to-end 802.1x project. I'm not sure where you are in regards to this being a project, but in order to ensure success, you may want to engage with someone to lay out all of the options available to you and then assemble an 802.1x Statement of Work with specific deliverables.<br/><br/>Ty Powers<br/><br/>Blue Spruce Technologies, Inc.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:51:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=14</link>
<title>Message from IT Sec tech</title>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ty,<br/><br/>Unless I misunderstand, your post seems to imply that this method will work regardless of the phone (Cisco, Nortel, Avaya, etc.), correct?   Also, you mean RADIUS attributes need to be defined on the ACS server right?]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=14</link>
<title>Message from tpowers</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hey IT Sec tech. <br/><br/>The answers to your questions will vary greatly based on variables such as switch manufacturer, phone manufacturer, and authentication server. <br/><br/>I've recently set up this scenario utilizing Polycom phones, Cisco 3750s, and Cisco ACS. This is possible thanks to the addition of multi-domain authentication in Cisco IOS. I believe that it was introduced back in version 12.2(35)xx. The Polycom phones have been profiled by Great Bay Software's Beacon and are authenticating via MAC Auth Bypass, while the client stations attached directly to the VoIP phones are utilizing PEAP for authentication. The switch configuration is pretty straight forward but Radius attributes should be defined to ensure that the switch knows that the phone is a voice device and that re-authentication won't stomp on the connection in the middle of a call. <br/><br/>Ty Powers<br/>Blue Spruce Technologies, Inc.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:03:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=14</link>
<title>Message from IT Sec tech</title>
<description><![CDATA[Has anyone had experience authenticating VOIP phones and PCs on the same switch port?  The PCs are plugged into the phones and the plan is for the PC/Laptop to have the 802.1X client, but the phones will not.  Should we expect the phone to MAC authenticate and the PC to EAP authenticate without any issues?]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=13</link>
<title>Message from gmarkley</title>
<description><![CDATA[I am sure this will help anybody trying to install beacon with multiple network tie in's. Thank you for submitting.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:04:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=13</link>
<title>Message from alball</title>
<description><![CDATA[If you are running into a situation where the web gui is on one network and all the snmp traffic is on another, there is an easy way to make this happen.<br/><br/>vi /etc/rc.conf<br/><br/>Add the following lines to the conf file:<br/><br/>static_routes="native"<br/>route_native="-net 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.1"<br/>defaultrouter="172.168.1.1"<br/><br/>The first line sets labels to the the routes which are referenced below.<br/>The second line tells the route command what route to add.  This example 192.168.1.0/24 network has a default gateway of 192.168.1.1. This way when the request to poll the devices on the native network the beacon system will route to the correct network.<br/>The last line is your route of last resort or default route. This is for the web interface of the beacon system.<br/><br/>All of this is documented at : <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-routing.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-routing.html</a><br/>Look under section 31.2.5.2.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=11</link>
<title>Message from tpowers</title>
<description><![CDATA[In Windows XP SP2 and earlier environments this gets a little tricky. Prior to Service Pack 3, Windows XP really only had GPO settings for wireless. That said, we have developed a Wired EAP Management tool to fill the void. Service Pack 3 catches up though a bit with the addition of the Wired Auto Config service.<br/><br/>Ty Powers<br/><br/>Blue Spruce Technologies, Inc.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=12</link>
<title>Message from khook</title>
<description><![CDATA[Yes the Cisco IP Cameras do send CDP.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=9</link>
<title>Message from jgorsky</title>
<description><![CDATA[The following is a very basic port config for a 3750 (that already has 802.1X enabled at switch-level) for MAC-auth-bypass. Note that there are multiple timers and other parameters of this config that need to be tuned for desired operation of MAB. If you have specific questions, I will try to answer but this is a pretty big topic.<br/><br/>interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19<br/> switchport mode access<br/> dot1x mac-auth-bypass<br/> dot1x pae authenticator<br/> dot1x port-control auto<br/> dot1x timeout quiet-period 10<br/> dot1x timeout reauth-period 60<br/> dot1x timeout tx-period 10<br/> dot1x timeout supp-timeout 10<br/> dot1x max-req 1<br/> dot1x reauthentication<br/> dot1x auth-fail max-attempts 1<br/> spanning-tree portfast<br/>!]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.greatbaysoftware.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=12</link>
<title>Message from jdamron</title>
<description><![CDATA[My initial thought on this is that your Video Cameras<br/>are talking CDP to the switch.  Beacon will mark ports<br/>with CDP information as trunks. Currently the only<br/>exception is for Cisco IP Phones.<br/><br/>Could you check the CDP information on that the port?]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
